At exactly the same time, regardless of if sex differences were asked, i receive no differences when considering women and men

While this type of results are notable, i compared and therefore model fitting the knowledge better making use of the Model AIC and you may Design CAIC coefficients to have low-nested design reviews each models’ fit indices. The first design had a better fit (Model AIC=; Model CAIC=-; NFI = .92; NNFI = .92; CFI = .94; RMSEA = .08) compared to choice model (Design AIC = & CAIC=-; NFI = .91; NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .09). The real difference into the fit across the one or two habits indicates all of our brand-new model’s theoretic rationale suits the content best (Byrne, 1994).

Talk

We create a structural design to evaluate if connections and you may confident event with homosexuals, perceived similarities that have peers’ perceptions for the homosexuality, and you may religiosity was in fact predictive out of sexual prejudice certainly a people regarding Puerto Rican teenagers. Our very own results recommend all the hidden parameters, apart from peers’ attitudes for the homosexuality, forecast participants’ intimate prejudice with the homosexual folks. If you are previous experts discovered intimate bias is generally high for males than just people (Kite, 1992; Herek, 2000b), we were struggling to simulate these abilities.

More lookup towards the potential relationship anywhere between intimate bias and social network features is justified to evaluate this type of consequences

Exactly how many homosexual individuals known because of the participants less its said sexual prejudice towards the homosexual people. Les mer »